A Halloween horror story: the Roberson case

 The right-wing blood lust in Texas is strong and no better illustrated in the fight to save Robert Roberson from execution. On one hand, Ken Paxton, Greg Abbott and other far right Republicans continue to push for Roberson’s lethal injection. On the other side are those who assert that Roberson is the victim of “junk science” — the now discredited “shaken baby syndrome.” Further, Texas’ 2013 so-called junk science law” in and of itself should provide Roberson with a new trial. The Texas Tribune has a comprehensive review of the Roberson case.

Non-critical thinkers may be puzzled. Why, in the face of overwhelming evidence that the case needs a full review if not a new trial, are GOP stalwarts so bent on killing Roberson? What all of us must understand is that this case is another form of intimidation from the far right. The advocates for executing Roberson want to send the message that the far right Republicans in charge of the state can find a legal way to kill anyone it chooses. Remember that old saw: “With the right prosecutor, a grand jury can indict a ham sandwich?”

Take note that those leading the stampede into the death chamber include Paxton, the clearly corrupt Texas attorney general, and Abbott, the governor who touts his devotion to Roman Catholicism except when the church talks of justice and the death penalty. But it’s also the Texas judiciary and the Abbott-appointed Pardons and Parole Board turning deaf ears to modern science and the facts of the case.

The Innocence Project, a leader in exonerating condemned inmates, is among those calling for restraint and revisiting the case in full. Allies in this quest include a bipartisan group of Texas lawmakers on the Texas House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence who succeeded in forcing a stay for Roberson’s scheduled October 17 execution.

What is important at this moment is to understand this part of the Texas political ecosystem is up for election on Nov. 5. To keep the far right officials in power is to risk the lives of those who would disagree with their dystopian and violence-fueled agenda. To vote to replace them with officials who are Democrats can turn the tide and redirect Texas to a more compassionate and rational place to live.

There! I've fixed it while the VA circles the drain

 As The Victoria Advocate circles the drain, I wanted to show you what the paper's new managing editor does as a reporter. Yes, I am picking on him. Why?

 Because he is turning what was once a fine newspaper into a Trumper religious rag; he is shutting down blogs that don't reflect his personal Christo-fascist view; he is mentoring a scant newsroom of green reporters who don't know how to write a tight story using AP style or how to do real reporting like making pubic records requests; he has ignored suggestions on how to drill deeper by filing public records requests; and, he has attacked me by asserting his 40-some years in journalism is superior to my master's in hospital administration, 25 years in the health care industry and 22 years as an award-wining journalist.

Decent people thwarted fascist-backed state-sponsored murder

There is no shortage of reprehensible behavior from Fuhrer Greg Abbott and his fascist henchmen, Reich-fuhrers Ken Paxton and Dan Patrick.

Those of us passionate about putting justice back into the justice system watched the maneuvering around Robert Roberson’s execution. We saw the Texas Pardons and Parole Board and Paxton willing to kill an innocent man who was condemned based on junk science. Roberson’s death penalty was based on using the fully debunked “shaken baby syndrome” as the reason for Nikki Curtis’ death. Complicating the case at the time of Roberson’s arrest and trial was his flat affect, now known as a symptom of his autism and not his indifference to his daughter’s passing.

But even the prosecutor and detective who handled the case originally repudiated their belief that Roberson was a killer. So did a bipartisan group of Texas legislators and the Innocence Project. And so does a Texas law passed in 2013 designed to protect people from being convicted based on junk science. All of these clear-minded people called for the execution be halted. When the blood-thirsty and ignorant members of the Pardons and Parole Board and Paxton pushed for the execution, the lawmakers, in a unique move, subpoenaed Roberson to testify before the Texas House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee today, Monday October 21. Decency at the Texas Supreme Court showed itself when the justices backed the lawmakers’ request thereby halting the execution.

Fascist-in-chief Abbott remained silent until today, spewing his cowardly play as Monday morning quarterback in the form of an amicus brief filed by James P. Sullivan, the governor's general counsel. In it, Abbott argued the legislators usurped the governor’s constitutional power to issue a 30-day clemency for the state-sponsored murder. Using the inelegant language, Abbott’s lawyer claimed the lege “stepped out of line,” according to a report from the Texas Tribune. Of course, in this way, we don’t know what the psychopath fuhrer would have done; but, those of us watching Abbott and his rise to power would bet that the blood of an innocent on his hands would not bother this monster not one whit.Meanwhile, Paxton, the corrupt Texas attorney general, thwarted the House committee. “But Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is representing the state’s prison system, said Roberson would only testify via video,” according to the Texas Tribune, also reporting that the committee’s chairman found that restriction unacceptable due to Roberson’s autism. The legal wrangling will continue for some time and Roberson can’t, according to law, be faced with another death warrant for 90 days.

Following this case will be important. If the blood thirsty fascists on the Pardons and Parole Board and blood-lust Abbott and Paxton continue to push this ultimate punishment, Texans will know beyond a shadow of a doubt that their interest isn’t justice — it’s power. Any clear-mined people following Abbott over the years would agree that he is mentally ill. Not only does that make Abbott in particular a hypocrite to his Catholic so-called faith but it also makes him dangerous.